Who are you?

April 24th, 2012

Ok, more family history/genealogy so click away now if that has absolutely zero interest to you :-) Family Tree 1.png

Having just completed what can only be described as a vast amount of filing for my family (over 130 people needed to be indexed and filed) it occurred to me to question who exactly I was filing and if they were really family. Genealogists trace bloodlines but all the websites throw up any record that matches anyone in your tree and, if there’s lots of records, you tend to follow that particular trail which usually results in ending up 2 or 3 marriages away from where you first started and actually exploring and recording bits of family that aren’t. Or rather, are only vaguely related via marriage or marriages. This does lead to a rapid expansion of your tree and the illusion that you’re getting somewhere in your research – after all, your tree is growing – but in reality, as I have just realised, you’re actually traipsing through someone else’s tree rather than spending time attending to your own.

So, the question is: how to stop yourself from wandering off following a trail you shouldn’t be on?

The new system I use for indexing (see last post) needs another modification to record the relationship of either parent to the people listed i.e. In the royal tree (see pic), Caroline Leary’s family would generate its own sheet which should state – probably at the top – that this is my fathers family, and the relationship is Grandparent. You can then assume that all descendants are Aunts, Uncles etc. and their descendants will be cousins of one form or another. For any family of a woman who marries into the direct line the relationship could be listed as ‘by marriage to xxxx’ or even ‘ by marriage to xxxx who married yyyy’ where yyyy is a direct ascendant. In this way you could quickly see if the bit of family you’re busy chasing through history is actually a proper bit of family and not a false trail you’re being led down by the availability of records of one sort or another.

I’ll have to create a new version of my index form and upload it at some point soon.

In case you’re wondering (like anyone has made it this far in reading this!), writing these types of entry helps me clarify my thinking and move myself forwards with maintaining a grip on my family tree as it threatens to sprawl out of control. If they’re useful to you, great! If not, stop reading them!

Share

Sorting out the mess we call family

April 9th, 2012

As well as selling tents and engaging in acts of violence against my friends (otherwise known as LARP), I do the odd bit of family history research. When I said ‘odd bit’ I mean, as you probably guessed, quite a lot. The problem however isn’t the cost (how much per certificate these days? talk about daylight robbery!) or even the time it takes to sift through thousands and thousands of records, it’s in knowing where you are with each person. In other words, how to organise yourself properly so you don’t waste more time than you have to every time you pick it up again. I am not a slow and steady researcher, I’m a bursts of enthusiasm followed by a few months break kind of researcher so knowing where I’d gotten to is quite important as, with age, my memory is not what it used to be. I have read quite a few articles and even some books on genealogy all with their own methods and means of recording and organising your family data but none of them sat comfortably with my IT-like brain and it took me a while to realise why; from a completely logical point of view i.e a computer view, none of them are right. Well, at least not for me.

So I came up with my own.

It’s not designed to to be the solution to everyone’s genealogy problems and, indeed, it doesn’t even record all the information that a real ‘expert’ would demand but it does have the benefit of making it very easy for me to keep track of what I’ve done and where I am. And it’s simple. Really simple. Like me.

So, some background. I predominantly use 3 tools in my research; Ancestry.co.uk, FreeBMD and Reuinion on my trusty Macbook (can’t believe they’ve ditched the Macbook and claim an Air is just as good – sometimes Apple are total muppets! Got to prostitute myself to afford a Pro now..) I used to use GenesReunited but let that subscription slip for now.

So:

Step 1. No printed information should exist in more than 1 place. This means that ANY information that refers to more than one person must be indexed and held separately: census forms, marriage certificates – No duplication is allowed.

Step 2 – Every item of shared information must be given a unique identification code.

Step 3 – Record these against the relevant people (otherwise what’s the point)

Step 4 – All personal information should be filed in alphabetical/year of birth order

Step 5 – Keep a simple index of what information has been found for which person.

Steps 1-4 are pretty normal and, I expect, even step 5 is carried out by most people in one way or another. In which case, congratulations, you are ahead of me and I bow down and worship at your feet (your toenails need clipping btw and that lime green varnish does your feet no favours at all; go for cherry red next time)

I started by creating a new folder for Census Forms and adding dividers for each year from 1841 to 1911 (as I don’t have any forms for earlier years yet). Charles Dunk info.png This folder is called CF (for Census Forms – I’m not a believer in having to work at anything too hard). There will be one for Marriage certificates soon (called MC no doubt) but as I’m not buying many at the moment it can wait. Every entry in the folder will have the same index format – CF/xx/yyyy where xx is the year in two digits (yes I know I’ll be in trouble in 1941 but that’s a long way away) and yyyy is the form number including the zeroes (0001,0002 etc). I generally scrawl this on the bottom right of each form (CF/01/0023 for example). Next I took the information off each form and entered it into my software creating a new source for each form and assigning it to the entry under the relevant person – See the pic for further details. I can now look at the entry in Reunion and instantly see that I have found Charles Dunk in the census and printed off the form and done the filing. Everyone else on the form is assigned the same source for that entry on their record.

Once this had been completed for every form I had (and there were several hundred so it took a while) I suddenly had alot less paper to deal with.

Next I created people folders: one for each of my main names (Royal & Dunk) and one for everyone else A-Z and filed everyone in chronological birth order. Some of my entries consist of a divider with the name and year of birth and just one person sheet so it gets a bit heavy on dividers but I’ve found it’s worth it just for the ease of quickly finding someone when you do want to file or find paperwork.

Once everything was organised I discovered that, while I felt better and it was alot neater and even took up less space, I was still unable to recall what I had discovered. I played around with flags and fields and searches in Reunion (being an IT child I wanted an IT solution) and managed to create even more work for myself so instead went back to the drawing board – in this case literally – and came up with an indexing system that is simple, quick and, most importantly, based on a piece of paper so is software independent.

To the right is the top section of the index for the Dunk family (as well as an example of how bad my writing is!).

Family index.JPG

The index consists of a simple chart with all the information I consider relevant marked along the top – as I have family who emigrated and who were in the armed forces in both wars and after I have columns for these. This is version 2 of the index and I will probably produce version 3 shortly with an additional column on the end for the married family name as I’ve taken to writing that on anyway.

It works very simply. You pick a person to start with; in this case John Dunk b 1829 (as far back as this branch goes so far). Underneath is his wife with her surname in brackets to indicate it is her maiden name and under her is all the children – usually in birth order but there’s no guarantee you have them all to start with. You then start filling out the index:

X – no record to be found i.e. born after that census date or not in armed forces or emigrated or died before the next census etc.

Highlighted – record found (and hopefully recorded/indexed/filed)

Horizontal arrow – This indicates that a daughter has gotten married and her record continues on another page. This must be accompanied by a page reference at the end and her new surname. In the example you can see that Annie Jane Dunk got married after the 1881 census to someone called Cock and her record continues on Dunk page 6 (I currently have Dunk pages and Royal pages but you could just have one massive index if you prefer)

Vertical arrow (usually down the left side) – This indicates that a son has gotten married and the family name continues further down the page. Here you can see that Charles Dunk married Mabel (Bingham). Under her are listed their children. The vertical line from Lilian May is a mistake but I couldn’t be bothered to rewrite the entire page and still haven’t found my tipex to correct it!

At a glance I can see what information has been found or not e.g. James Dunk b 1854 has no census entry for 1871 or 1911 and I still have to find his marriage (unlikely as he was still single in 1901 age 47) or his death. If I now look at his record in Reunion I can see, in the notes section, that I have looked for him in the 1911 census and found no entry nor have I found a death record for him between 1901 & 1911. It takes me only a few minutes to ascertain exactly where I had gotten to with my Dunk research and to pick it up again.

If the family looks like it is going off the bottom of the page then you can simply put a contd and a page reference number – it doesn’t have to be sequential either. This is Dunk page 1 and Dunk page 2 is for Arnold (married name of Emma Dunk b 1861). Further down the page – where you can’t see it – is the entry for my mother which has a page reference of Royal 2.4 indicating that she continues elsewhere in the family.

I have found these indexes to be incredibly useful in keeping track of where I am and what I have/have not found out so far about the family. By starting a new sheet for each different married name you can also avoid getting confused over who is who and which line is which. Finally, as they’re on paper they are easily corrected (you can see where I have corrected birth years above) which avoids having to constantly reprint information so you’re saving the lives of twigs everywhere.

Attached to this blog entry is hopefully the blank index sheet in both pdf and ods format so you can use/modify to your hearts content without fear of recrimination or sulking unless of course you try and pass it off as your own in which case I reserve the right to be horrible and mean to you. But it won’t come to that cos, so far, I’ve only ever met nice people doing family history research.

Enjoy and I hope you find it useful. Any comments or suggestions gratefully received.

Mark

Family Index Sheet   Family Check list

Share

Mondays

November 14th, 2011

It’s never polite to call people on a Monday morning – especially when your working day starts at least an hour before anyone elses (joys of a different time zone). Which always leaves me at a loose end with what to start with every week. I mean, you don’t want to throw yourself into work first thing do you? So I’m starting with more pictures of more visits and events and waffling on about stuff while I wait for the pictures to be sent up the wire and to the website. It always amazes me how many places we go each year doing deliveries and attending events, especially when these are spilt across multiple countries, yet somehow we manage to fit them all in and not die of exhaustion on the way – although it has been close a few times so we’re well acquainted with places to stop as we criss-cross the continent for a quick nap.

Next year is already shaping up to be busy with large sections of June, July and August already blocked out and tentative events for May and September hanging about with a pleading puppy-dog look in their eyes begging to be nailed down and gone to. We shall see. As per normal a lot of events are jostling for position, shoulder to shoulder with one another which doesn’t leave a lot of time for either checking and repairing tentage or even getting from one event to another. As it stands the first event of the year may well be the UK LARP Awareness party run by our friends from Having A LARP (find them on facebook) but I have yet to persuade Inga that we do want to travel to the UK when the weather is rubbish. Mind you, it won’t be much better here as we’ll no doubt have snow and thick ice on the ground – it’s very pretty for a few weeks and then it just becomes annoying as hell – especially when you have to clear the path outside your house everyday.

All the events we’re attending or thinking of attending, will be posted in the Events section of the Info site so you’ll know where you can come along and beg a cup of tea from or have a general chat or gossip about all things tent shaped.

Just to whet your appetite (hopefully), here’s a few pics of what to expect this week as I continue the scramble to document 2011 before it ends – it’s going to be a close run thing!

The Folk Trail                                                   Gina gets frisky at a Jurte training session          Possibly the best fire show ever
Gina gets it on.jpg Fire show.jpg Folk Trail.jpg

Share

Seeing & Travelling

December 2nd, 2010

I wrote “We see, but we don’t see’, which was prompted by my almost daily trip to make survey calls (I only do about 3 hours a day at the most cos I get phone crazy after that point. Good job it’s calls to Ireland at the moment where crazy is a national trait! Gotta love the Irish.) I travel by train, well, foot, tram and train, which takes about an hour each way which is plenty of time to observe the scenery, my fellow passengers and my surroundings. As my writing skills get forced, kicking and screaming, back into full working order, I find I’m taking more time to really observe things.

The tram part of my journey offers nothing very different from a car journey in terms of scenery, but that’s not to say it’s dull and dreary.Alleyway.jpg The tram always has passengers; sometimes a few, sometimes it’s packed. Alot depends on the time of day. German schools start early and finish early so soon after lunch the trams are packed with kids of all ages going home. And I mean all ages. German kids do not get taken to and from school by their parents (well a few do but they’re the exception, a real exception). There is no school run, the concept is alien to German parents. You’ll probably find that any parent who insisted on taking their children to school after the age of 6 or 7 would be investigated for being over-protective! Result! So the tram is sometimes mobbed by kids; noisy, shouting kids weighed down by backpacks but not yet pummelled into submission by life. Along with them you get pensioners, helping each other on and off with care. And mums with toddlers and pushchairs; men and women making their way to and from work – Germans start work early too. Seriously. Alot of them are at work between six and seven AM! I’m not even contemplating waking up at that hour, let alone up, dressed, breakfasted and at work! So, of course, they finish early too – maybe there is some sort of method in their early morning madness after all? The entire cross section of life is there, on a single tram. It’s a heavily used and popular form of transport, especially when you combine it with cheap and easy rail travel too. Throw in a tram station that is directly under the main train station (with the main bus depot right outside the front door) and you have a recipe for transport success and use. Which is deviating from the point I was going to make but that’s ok, wandering and being deviant is good. Remember that; normality bad, deviance good. Within reason. Or behind closed doors and curtains.

So, (must stop using that word to start sentences) the tram part of my journey is usually taken up by observing people rather than scenery. This is due, I should say, in part to the tram route which is mainly down the centre of the road and two lanes of traffic on either side does not a pretty picture paint – unless you like industrial carbon monoxide spewing boxes on petro-chemical wheels. The train however brings not just new sights but a totally different perspective on everyday life. People and businesses live with their backs to the train tracks. It’s almost a matter of out of sight, out of mind, or possibly a lack of care due to the simple fact that no one stops and looks from the railway track side. Any one who does see gets merely a glimpse at high speed and has little or no reference to place where they saw it. So you see things you wouldn’t normally see, catch glimpses of the real life behind the facade that faces the street and the illusion of respectability; brief, intriguing glimpses that sets your mind wandering and narratives spilling through your brain trying to be the one that grabs your attention and result in the creation of a blog entry, a short story, even a random bit of writing – just as long as that idea is the one that gets written down so it, even if for only a brief moment, lives. The difference I suppose between an ordinary person and a writer, is that we make ourselves write down these impressions, these moments; we capture them in words – just like a photographer captures them in pixels (film is so last century!). Maybe what is captured will turn out to be rubbish, but, the thing is, we capture them and record them regardless. It is another step, or another block, in what it means, in my opinion, to be a writer.

PS. Today’s picture was again taken in Hattingen. Alleyways and lanes are always fascinating; do you walk on by or follow your curiosity?

Share
Follow tortugatents on Twitter Find Tortuga Tents on Facebook